Situational Leadership Theory and Organizational Leadership Research Paper

Situational Leadership Theory and Organizational Leadership - Research Paper role modelLeadership is the process of the influence a leader instils on others to achieve an objective and make an governing productive. Situation leadership theory is useful and relevant in developing an effective leadership culture. Fiedler happening model, House and Mitchells Path-goal theory, and Hersey-Blanchard situational leadership are three situational leadership theories that are effective in management.In accordance to Fielder, situational leadership, especially in a high idiom situation is largely mismatched by the leaders inability to use his intellectual resources to solve the problem or ease the stress in organization. The use of intelligence as opposed to criticism or stress is vital in the organization (Fiedler, 1992). The focus on the effective tasks structuring and directing both the white perk up and blue collar employees, enhancing likenessships between leaders and subordinates i n times of stress and finally the focus on the leaders power, or the positive attributes of the leadership style to reduce stress in organizations undergoing difficult situations.In relation to the strengths of the model, it focuses on a single leadership style, which incorporates all leadership styles possible depending with the situation. The main emphasis is non on the alteration of the style of leadership, but rather the use of the key advantages of the leadership style a manager or leader is used to, in issuing direction and motivating the subordinates to achieve a set task or goal. The model also emphasizes that if a certain trait about the leadership style that suits the subordinates, will lead to self-motivation. As such, instead of concentrating on the stressfulness of the situation, using ones strengths to outgrowth their own strengths would marginally reduce the stressful nature of the situation. However, one of the key weaknesses of the model is that it lacks to acknow ledge that close to of the leaders have low